 |
|
How
I wrote Music ... Then
I
relied on the instructions of my pop teacher, writing the melody
line in the treble clef and accompanying chord symbols. But when
the music came to me fast I just scribbled letters instead of
notes. (I still have notebooks containing those first efforts.)
The first “real” music came to me one day while I
was sitting on a rock at Old Garden Beach in Rockport, Massachusetts.
Words from a poem I hadn’t thought about in years (ee cummings’ I
thank you god for most this amazing) suddenly came to me, and
with them--music. I raced home to write down the music spilling
out of me. The piece, which I consider my signature work, is
for chorus and orchestra and has yet to be performed.
In
time, my eyes healed and I set out to study composition and,
ultimately, orchestration. I realized that if I wanted
people to perform my music, I had to be able to write it. And
as I gradually heard music for instruments other than piano,
I had to learn to write for all instruments. Just as I had been
tutored in music as a young girl at home, so as an adult my learning
came from private instruction. I studied composition with Steven
Savage from the New England Conservatory of Music in Boston,
and orchestration with Randall Woolf from Harvard University.
When Randy first took me on, he said, “You’ve got
the gift (to compose). What you need are the tools.” During
the next four years, he opened the world of orchestral sound
to me for he had a great command of the instruments. Always,
we worked from my own music. I hung in there, writing music notation
which, for me, was a back-to-the-future experience!
|
|
How
I Compose Music ... Today
I
compose using state-of-the-art music technology, employing both
my gift to play by ear and applying the knowledge derived from
my study in orchestration. I am a creative artist, which for
me means that music comes to me free-flowing without any plan
on my part. I sit at the keyboard and give voice to a particular
image or impression. At this initial stage of the creative process,
the music comes from my emotions; it is not in the least cognitive.
This stage is the most important part of the process because
here the music makes itself known. My task is to patiently attend
to the work manifesting itself to me.
Even
at this early stage, the creative act is rarely the same. Sometimes
melody comes in a rush from beginning to end. Other times a musical
mood dominates (an introduction, for instance), setting the tone
from which I eventually hear the melody. Occasionally, I just fool
around on the keyboard, and when I get a sense that something is
happening, stay with the music for as long as it takes to play itself
out. In all instances, I leave the music alone at various intervals
so that I can hear it anew. Sometimes I need to give the music time
to germinate in me; other times I need to give myself time to hear
the music that’s already there. This hearing can take minutes,
hours, or over a long period of time. It requires a lot of discipline
to hear the music as it is, not as I want it to be. Once I sense
the music’s gone as far as I can hear, the second stage begins.
Now
imagination and cognition, daring and skill--the nuts and bolts of
arranging or orchestrating--take over. Where in the initial stage
I am more passive than active to the music, in the second stage I
enter in. In developing the piece, I have to take great care not
to lose the original sense of the music. If I do, I can misshape,
or worse, destroy the heart of a work by trying to “make it
better.” Choice of instruments is crucial because instruments
voice the identity of the music. So arranging or orchestrating music
is hard work, and the choices I make are utterly essential to maintain
the integrity of the work.
It’s
hard to stay with a piece to completion, to resist the temptation
to say it’s finished when I know in my heart it is not. So
I step aside for a week or so, then listen again. Finally satisfied,
I’m ready for the final stage: I mix the music internally (each
instrument), burn the cd, and send it to a music production company
for mastering, graphics, and duplication.
Technology
has changed radically the way I compose music. While creating music
remains, for me, first and foremost an inner hearing, I have become
more adventurous, more daring in using the sounds so readily available
at my fingertips. I hear the instruments all at once as I compose
now, and can record them instantly. Still, music technology is not
without tension. For instance, when I need to re-key a passage, I
run the risk of losing the original feeling which, for me, nearly
always is the best.
Technology
also has helped me resolve my aversion to performing in public. By
recording cds in my home studio, I can reach a limitless audience
without ever going on stage.
Composing
a song usually takes months for me, and a long work, years. I often
work on several “collections” (potential cds) at a time.
For instance, I began writing the songs for Jimmie K on Broadway
while orchestrating the music for Clark Bridge Symphony . And I wrote
the title piece in A Tribute to North American Indians ten
years before the other songs in Tribute came to me in 2003.
I
compose on a Kurzweil PC88MX digital keyboard, using Digital Performer
music software and the PowerMac G3 computer. I work solely with sound
instead of notation because, as explained above, sight reading has
never been my forte. Instead of notation, I work from the soundbytes
I view on the monitor screen. Although I am not in the least “techy,” I
have learned to respect technology because it is the tool which enables
me to get my music heard.
|